|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Oct 6, 2012 17:24:19 GMT -5
The new FA chart and criteria has been emailed to all and updated on the rules. Please use this thread to ask any questions you may have.
|
|
|
|
Post by LosAngelesGM on Oct 6, 2012 17:32:37 GMT -5
Nick, I hope others follow with thanks since you put in so much personal time to make the league better. I appreciate everything you do for the league, and I hope others appreciate that you bend over backwards to make sure the league is as close to perfect as it can be.
|
|
|
|
Post by carolinagm on Oct 6, 2012 17:45:44 GMT -5
Well, I don't want to complain or anything. I'm not even 'pro' or 'con' on the whole thing, since I'm new to the league. However I've been reading the entire thread about the offers, and I thought the main 'issue' was that lower guys (4th liners, 73 OV) were being paid too much.. I had re-signed Troy Brodie to a 1 year, $700,000 deal and Brett Sutter to a 1 year, $1,000,000 deal. With this new chart, I'm supposed to sign these guys for $1,250,000 each, no? Again, don't mean to complain at all, but isn't this making things even worse? Or were my guys perhaps re-signed at a wrong salary before? Or am I not following things clearly?  And yes, I too see Nick puts a lot of work into the league, and I know what it takes as I've helped run a league before myself. Nothing besides respect for anyone who does it. |
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Oct 6, 2012 17:54:32 GMT -5
Again, don't mean to complain at all, but isn't this making things even worse? Or were my guys perhaps re-signed at a wrong salary before? Or am I not following things clearly? The new chart is a guideline. It doesn't mean that they bracketed number for that player has to be exact. I tried to be as clear as possible in the email. Look in the email at the three examples I gave (I'd copy/paste, but I'm being lazy). the number in the chart is like a starting point, your offer can be lower/higher depending on the other circumstances. Your first offers weren't too low or anything, but since I re-did the system, I made all offers have to be re-submitted. As far as making the system worse, under the old system, any player 71+ was 1,000,000. |
|
|
|
Post by carolinagm on Oct 6, 2012 17:58:36 GMT -5
OK, like I said, perhaps I didn't see things correctly I did read your e-mail and the examples you made with Anaheim. And yeah, I didn't think about the 71+ players. Either way I'm sure in the longer run of things this chart will be very good for the league! Other leagues I've been in also used similar charts and it was great for the parity in the league. Good job on you, Nick! |
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Oct 6, 2012 18:03:51 GMT -5
I've used a similar type chart in past leagues and it's worked out pretty well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Avs on Oct 6, 2012 20:20:56 GMT -5
What the FUCK is this BULLSHIT!??
J/K. Thanks for your hard work commish. Chart looks good and your efforts are appreciated.
|
|
