|
Post by bluejacketsgm on Aug 30, 2011 14:44:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by BluesGM on Aug 30, 2011 15:17:36 GMT -5
i'm really not sure what to say without completely alienating someone. it's a sticky situation with no easy answer.
i'm not too sure allowing the teams to re-work the deals is smart. if will already deemed those prices as enough, the GM's are just going to add players/assets that they dont really care much about to make the deal look improved on the surface, but in reality the basis of the deal is the same.
nick - in the end it's just your call. you cant please everyone as commish, so just do what you think is right. but like we talked about on aim, vetoing the deals is just a band-aid solution to the problem....
EDIT: also, trades that have been passed already should NOT be reversed. and i'm not saying this because i made a deal with him...i don't think anyone has a problem with what i gave up for malkin, but once trades get accepted, they shouldn't be reversed.
|
|
|
Post by ducksgm on Aug 30, 2011 15:32:51 GMT -5
no way this deal is fair ,not even close
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Aug 30, 2011 16:06:02 GMT -5
I have spoken to both GMs and they have agreed to try and re-work the deal. If a Getzlaf deal cannot be re-worked with Columbus then he must remain with Pittsburgh for the rest of the season.
|
|
|
Post by bluejacketsgm on Aug 30, 2011 19:14:30 GMT -5
I have spoken to both GMs and they have agreed to try and re-work the deal. If a Getzlaf deal cannot be re-worked with Columbus then he must remain with Pittsburgh for the rest of the season. end of story~!
|
|
|
Post by blackhawks on Aug 30, 2011 20:50:55 GMT -5
I'm ok with the Malkin deal. All of the trades after that are not even close to being equal.
|
|