|
Post by bluejacketsgm on Jul 13, 2011 17:39:38 GMT -5
"I've noticed players go up in stats after the age of 30."
Leadership and experience don't count =)
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Jul 13, 2011 19:26:38 GMT -5
I've run FHL leagues since 2000. I have most definently seen a player 30+ have stats that have gone up. Whatever the auto decline function was in the earliest versions of the sim has been taken out.
The files aren't perfect, however, I've yet to be in a league where they have been. I had to practically build the files from scratch and it took a long time. The days of going on FHLSIM.com and getting a full file setup are over. If you're lucky, you'll get a player database, but the ratings are atrocious. You think we have some players that are too low/high? When I got the files, EVERY middle range player was rated the EXACT same. Literally, each player had a 72 sc, 70 all other offense skills(pa,sk,pc) and 25 for everything else except IT.
If we end up with some sort of rerate system it will be minimal.
|
|
|
Post by blackhawks on Jul 13, 2011 21:04:41 GMT -5
Mike Green has 72 defense rating. I win. Didnt Sandis Ozolinsh have around a 55D rating back in the day?
|
|
|
Post by BluesGM on Jul 13, 2011 21:44:35 GMT -5
Mike Green has 72 defense rating. I win. Didnt Sandis Ozolinsh have around a 55D rating back in the day? Mike Green's should be like 35.
|
|
|
Post by hurricanes on Jul 22, 2011 11:06:35 GMT -5
My honest opinion? I'm 100% against NHL rerates. They inflate the ratings and by season 5 or 6 you have 4th liners with 76-77 overalls and such. I've run FHL leagues for over 10 years now. My one league, the WHL, became defunct after 11 seasons because ratings were so high and disproportioned that we could even fill 1/2 the league anymore. I think on it's own, the sim does a pretty good job of re-rating it's own players at the end of the season. Players in this sim, should have to perform in the sim in order to be rerated. I'm with Chicago on this one, if we really want to discuss NHL rerates, then players also have to be eligible to be downgraded as well. Yup. I used to run a league as well (with some GM's currently in this league) and exactly what you said does happen. You have rosters that are just loaded and it becomes almost stupid. Because everyone wants to upgrade but downgrading is a four letter word. Plus you have guys like Cheechoo, Marek Svatos etc. who have a good season or two, get re-rated up yet never go back after they fall back to Earth. I mean, how many leagues is Petr Prucha probably a star in based off his rookie season.
|
|
|
Post by bluejacketsgm on Jul 23, 2011 17:54:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Avs on Jul 23, 2011 18:05:38 GMT -5
I wonder if he'd make me a Colorado version.
|
|
|
Post by CanucksGM on Aug 17, 2011 1:50:56 GMT -5
I say once the league is started, we stay with what the people in the sim earn. It's not like we jump in and say "Well the Capitals still have Ovechkin, so then the washington in the sim should have him back this season."
The only NHL input I see we might want to consider, is if we activate a sim prospect, who has already started in the NHL for a full season, not just a quick call up. Just because we have the most up to date rating on that prospect.
|
|
|
Post by bluejacketsgm on Sept 1, 2011 0:15:51 GMT -5
after looking at everyones roster for the umpteenth time during this deadline I noticed that I didn't seem to see any guys with high speed ratings...I went trolling down the list of players and found that indeed there are only two in the entire league (goalies aside) with SP higher than 80...and only 1 other player with 79..the next closest is 77 and there are a handful+ out there with that
Ladies and germs..the fastest player is... Enver Lisin 82sp runner-up.... Pavel Datsyuk 81sp Boobie prize goes to Shean Donovan with 79sp
|
|
|
Post by sensgm on Sept 1, 2011 5:05:21 GMT -5
Who is the slowest player
|
|