|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Dec 17, 2011 14:34:02 GMT -5
We are voting on whether or not We will utilize NHL rerates in the ECFHL. Each team gets one vote. The voting will end in 3 days(Tuesday). The stipulation of the rerates are listed below. These are non-negotiable. You either vote for these rerates or we don't have rerates.
NHL Rerate: NHL Rerates would happen at the end of each even numbered ECFHL season(every other). No player 35+ y.o are eligible. To qualify a player must have played two full NHL seasons or 164 total NHL games. Teams will be allowed to choose 1 or 2 players to be NHL upgraded. If they choose one player, that player will be NHL rerated. If they choose to use both rerates, the ECFHL staff will choose one player from that team to receive an NHL downgrade.
All rerates up or down will be handled by a committee of 3-4 GMs including PJ and myself.
You can discuss this vote by posting in this thread, however, no arguing/fighting will be tolerated. Also any teams who try and cheat the vote by creating a fake profile and voting will be fired for cheating and being a complete moron.
|
|
|
Post by Avs on Dec 17, 2011 14:46:49 GMT -5
Hugo Frost approves.
|
|
|
Post by LosAngelesGM on Dec 17, 2011 15:08:36 GMT -5
I approve of the rerates
|
|
|
Post by oilersgm on Dec 17, 2011 15:24:02 GMT -5
I approve
|
|
|
Post by blackhawks on Dec 17, 2011 15:27:00 GMT -5
I vote no. Too many players who are due huge re-rates have been traded based on their lower value.
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Dec 17, 2011 15:39:35 GMT -5
I voted no. Doesn't really matter to me either way, so I voted for less work
|
|
|
Post by sensgm on Dec 17, 2011 16:30:31 GMT -5
I say No no no! *in an Amy Winehouse voice*
|
|
|
Post by blackhawks on Dec 17, 2011 17:25:31 GMT -5
This sounds like a good idea in theory, but a league must be started with this rule.
|
|
|
Post by oilersgm on Dec 17, 2011 17:40:37 GMT -5
This sounds like a good idea in theory, but a league must be started with this rule. there was no rule when we started I was under the impression there was going to be when we started then it was said no
|
|
|
Post by ducksgm on Dec 17, 2011 18:00:46 GMT -5
it makes sense to have it otherwise future stars will be drafted with low ratings and never be what they should be and its not realistic.
|
|