Harry
Full Member
Posts: 133
|
Post by Harry on Dec 18, 2011 2:13:34 GMT -5
Now it works, vote placed.
|
|
|
Post by sensgm on Dec 18, 2011 10:04:35 GMT -5
I voted No... but one extra rule I would like to see added if we do have NHL rerates would be that no player can go up more than 3OV (As Alex originally suggested)
|
|
|
Post by sensgm on Dec 18, 2011 10:58:16 GMT -5
It's not changing any of the rules... its adding! YOU CHAV!
|
|
|
Post by ECFHL Commissioner on Dec 18, 2011 12:41:59 GMT -5
I'm so sick and tired of the whiny and sarcastic comments. We're having a vote on NHL rerates because our GMs wanted one and I'm trying to do what the majority feel is the best for the league. Maybe next time there is a league suggestion I'll just answer with a big FUCK YOU. Every single time there is a respectable complaint, PJ and myself look into it, take suggestions and do what we feel is best for the league. We changed the prospect system based on your suggestions, we changed the offseason waiver and buyout rule based on your suggestions. Rules change, not all, but sometimes rules change and affect different teams. I try to be fair to all, but it's an impossible task.
I created the re-rate stipulations based on many of the suggestions made to me. I don't want a league of 18-24 kids with overall ratings 77+. I've run leagues for over ten years and one inparticular for 7-8 years alone. I know that sim progression, with the addition of outside rating enforcements, can cause havoc. If you don't like it, you can go and join one of the many FHL leagues with 80ov 4th liners that lasts 1-2 seasons and folds.
I run an FHL league because I have a passion for hockey and it keeps me in contact with a few close friends who I don't really see all that often anymore. I don't mind complaints, arguments or suggestions. I'm sick of the whining, moaning and sarcastic shit that is posted in every thread about every topic. If you disagree with certain league decisions, do you really think mocking me is going to get me to see the light? I mean seriously?
There's a pretty good possibility that at the conclusion of this vote I will be shutting down the forums and only allowing PJ and myself to post up trades, FA signings and waiver moves in the transaction board.
|
|
Harry
Full Member
Posts: 133
|
Post by Harry on Dec 18, 2011 13:33:56 GMT -5
Controlled and limited rerates are sensible. Of course rules have to be fine tuned (i.e. the number of rerates allowed to be used on a single player, a minimum age requirement as well as game requirement, etc.).
Limiting how many overall rating points a player can be rerated to would be a good way to avoid having a bunch of young players be rated in the 80s. There are very few players and exceptional players who should get that honor.
|
|
|
Post by Avs on Dec 18, 2011 13:42:13 GMT -5
Don't shut down the forums, just block the Blue Jackets GM.
|
|
|
Post by oilersgm on Dec 18, 2011 13:44:26 GMT -5
Calm down commish your doing a great job,if anyones that unhappy they can quit,all sims get there critism just remember no one likes Bettman! lol
|
|
|
Post by BluesGM on Dec 18, 2011 14:01:13 GMT -5
Hey Eric, get a fucking life and stop posting stupid comments every two seconds. Youre not funny... at all. Stop trying to be.
|
|
|
Post by isles on Dec 18, 2011 14:34:50 GMT -5
It is a fairly standard rule in most fhlsim rerate leagues to have 1 or 2 NHL rerates. My only question is how does the "downgraded" player get chosen? Most ratings to lose? random choice?
I'll just stick to one NHL rerate:)
|
|
|
Post by Avs on Dec 18, 2011 14:36:32 GMT -5
when did the isles get a new gm?
|
|